Product 02 · Zentari Nano

Carrier design across models, motion and flow.

Candidate manifests move from fast analytical references through Brownian and Stokesian dynamics, optimisation and controlled CFD without losing their evidence lineage.

Analytic Stokes surface traction on an undisturbed carrier and illustrative deformed response
FIG 03 Analytic Stokes field · illustrative responsemain · 1cacc2d · 14 µm radius · 160 nm slip length Analytic creeping-flow reference; deformation is not OpenFOAM, solved FSI, hardware or laboratory evidence.
Open evidence →
Engineering stateDeterministic carrier and simulation pipeline
Scientific evidenceL2 in-silico internal benchmark
Next gateMeasured rig data and sim-to-real reconciliation

A score is useful only when its physics and provenance remain inspectable.

Workflow

Fast exploration, controlled escalation.

Baseline methods remain available while challengers earn promotion through real-data benchmark reports.

  1. 01Specify

    Carrier geometry, payload, actuation and fluid context.

  2. 02Evaluate

    Analytic Stokes and BD/SD establish fast references.

  3. 03Search

    NSGA-II, MAP-Elites, ParEGO or qNEHVI behind a common seam.

  4. 04Challenge

    Selected cases escalate to a governed OpenFOAM runner.

  5. 05Validate

    Convergence, physics QC and non-convergent demotion.

  6. 06Retain

    Manifest, fields, Pareto set and benchmark evidence.

Actual results

A field view and an internal reference floor.

The hero is analytic, not CFD. The benchmark is simulated, not measured.

Analytic Stokes surface traction on an undisturbed carrier and illustrative deformed response
FIG 03 Analytic Stokes field · illustrative responsemain · 1cacc2d · 14 µm radius · 160 nm slip length Analytic creeping-flow reference; deformation is not OpenFOAM, solved FSI, hardware or laboratory evidence.
Open evidence →
Internal MicroCarrierBench plot comparing magnetic, acoustic and passive reference carriers across four tasks
FIG 04 MicroCarrierBench v0.1 · internal L2 benchmarkzen-magnetic 88.56 · zen-acoustic 88.22 · passive floor 2.44 Every entry is unmeasured and in-silico; no external benchmark or sim-to-real gap is available.
Open evidence →
Magnetic reference
88.56
MicroCarrierBench v0.1 aggregate
Acoustic reference
88.22
internal simulated baseline
Passive floor
2.44
reference bead aggregate
Reference radius
14 µm
analytic field figure input
Slip length
160 nm
declared analytic parameter
Measured entries
0
every leaderboard record is in-silico

Methods

A validation-gated learning stack.

Each stage has a default baseline and a challenger that cannot become default on name or novelty alone.

Forward models

Analytic Stokes, physics-aware test doubles, real OpenFOAM runners and uncertainty-aware surrogate interfaces.

Figure 03 uses the analytic path.

Stochastic motion

Brownian and Stokesian dynamics support trajectory and mobility evidence.

Model assumptions remain in-silico until a rig closes the gap.

Optimisation

Multi-objective, quality-diversity and Bayesian searchers share benchmark and promotion records.

Search finds candidates; it does not validate them.

Active learning

Random, uncertainty and diverse-uncertainty acquisition strategies can target expensive labels.

Real OpenFOAM or measured labels are required for promotion.

No hardware result is hidden inside the render.

Bring the next claim into contact with reality.